Practice on your own
A solo run: no candidate link, no consent, straight into the board with the clock and the reveals. It scores against your rubric so a month of practice becomes a progression.
Diagraw Interviews
One board, two roles, one clock the server owns. You get the phase plan, the prompt you reveal in pieces and a private lane for notes and scores. They get the board, the statement and the time left. It ends in a report you can read six weeks later.
No card to start. Your candidate joins from a link, without an account and with nothing to install.
No inventing the question five minutes beforehand. The bank ships ten system design prompts from junior to staff, each with the facts you hold back and the concepts you expect to hear. If none of them is your problem, write yours with its own reveals and the interview runs identically.
Creating an interview mints one board and four secrets. The link decides the role before the connection is registered, so nobody is one query parameter away from the wrong half of the room.
This asymmetry is the feature. Everything the candidate must not see is built per role on the server: their frame is assembled without your notes, your rubric, the phase plan and the reveals you have not dropped yet. It is not filtered afterwards, so a filtering slip cannot leak it.
Everything you need, none of it reaching the other side.
The board, the problem, and how long is left.
Laptops die and wifi drops. When the person being evaluated disappears, twenty-five seconds of grace absorb the tunnel and then the clock stops and the board freezes with it. When they come back, both start again — and only if the pause was automatic, because one you asked for is yours to undo.
The candidate is told this runs. The consent notice they answer before the board opens names it: window changes, copying and pasting. They do not get a live read-out, because a real-time warning is a training aid for whoever wanted to game it.
Every one of these signals has an innocent reading — reading the statement in another tab looks exactly like reading an answer in another tab. They are something to ask about, never something that scores. And they are not a lock: anyone determined can stop a browser from reporting them.
You close with a verdict and a line of summary. What lands is the scored rubric, the notes at the minute you wrote them, the moments you marked, and what the finished board ended up covering against what the prompt expected.
Every accepted change to the board is appended to a log while the interview runs. The first entry is the board as the candidate found it, so the player rebuilds the session forwards rather than reconstructing it backwards from the final picture.
The same session machinery, pointed at three different jobs.
A solo run: no candidate link, no consent, straight into the board with the clock and the reveals. It scores against your rubric so a month of practice becomes a progression.
One prompt, one board per student. The room a student walks into is the same one a candidate would, and you can walk the grid from your own view of each.
Members share the prompts, the rubric and the retention window. Suspending someone frees their seat and keeps their history.
Free is a real plan, not a trial. Interviewing is bursty by nature, so a seat you are not using can be freed.
Prices include the plan for the whole product, not only the interview feature. Cancel any time; payment is handled by Paddle.
No. They open the link you send, type a name and they are in. There is nothing to install and no signup, which is deliberate: the first three minutes of a round should not be spent on a login form.
Yes. Write the title, the statement and the facts you want to reveal later, and the interview runs exactly as it does with a bank prompt. Free accounts can write one a month; Pro is unlimited.
Your notes, your rubric and its scores, the phase plan, the reveals you have not dropped yet, the verdict, and the activity signals. Their frame is built on the server without those fields rather than filtered afterwards, so it cannot leak through a mistake in the client.
Yes, before the board opens. They read what is kept and answer, and their answer is stored with the version of the text they agreed to. The notice also names the activity signals: window changes, copying and pasting. What they do not get is a live warning while it happens.
No, and nothing in the product turns them into a number. Each one has an innocent reading, so they exist to be asked about. They are also not a barrier: a determined person can stop their browser from reporting them, which is why we would rather tell you what they are worth than oversell them.
Twenty-five seconds of grace, so a reload costs nothing. Past that, if the person being evaluated is still gone, the clock stops and the board freezes with it, and both restart when they come back. If it was you who dropped, your candidate keeps designing and the clock keeps running.
For the retention window you choose. After that the board, the notes and the replay are purged. The candidate can ask for deletion from the report itself, and an interview nobody ever opened is cancelled rather than kept.
Yes, with the observer link, and up to five of them on Pro. They can read the private lane but cannot draw, and everyone in the room is told they are there — the candidate included.
Yes. A class opens one board per student on the same prompt, and each of those boards is an ordinary interview, so the room a student enters is the room a candidate would. There is also a solo practice mode with no candidate and no consent step.
Yes. Two interviews a month of up to thirty minutes, three of the ten prompts and the full report and replay, with no card. Pro raises the caps at 6 € a month.
Open a board, pick a prompt and send the link. The first interview takes about a minute to set up, and you can practise on your own first if you would rather not learn on a candidate.
Start an interview free